For shame! September 6, 2007
Posted by millyonair in Uncategorized.trackback
A few months before my wedding, I was employed as a waitress in a somewhat run-down, poorly-decorated, slightly stale-smelling Mexican food restaurant. This is one of the three restaurants in the small Texas town where I grew up, and where I have returned to live after meandering around the Southern and Western portions of the U.S. for about 10 years. One evening I happened to find myself waiting on an older woman with whom I had been employed as a teenager. The woman was a person I respected. On top of being a talented writer and notoriously gifted chef, she had always been kind to me when I was an obnoxious and moody teen, and again as a patron of the restaurant where I regularly served her enchiladas (i.e., she was a good tipper). But my esteem of her open-mindedness withered on this night.
While chit-chatting about my upcoming marriage, she asked me what I intended to “do” after the wedding, questioning, I assume, whether or not I would still continue to work as a waitress. I told her no, that since I was resuming my classes in the fall, I had decided to devote the rest of my summer to “being a wife.” She made no attempt to mask the disapproval on her face. “What’s the matter, Miss Laura*?” I asked her, “You look concerned!”
“I am,” she replied. “I’ve just always thought you were so smart. I just hate to see-” She broke off and refused to continue.
I was stymied. After all, my plans included the completion of a university degree. Furthermore, what the heck did she think was so great about me being a waitress? It’s not like I had decided to abandon my seat in the Senate in favor of exploring my new duties as a wife. But even if I had decided to assume domestic duties instead of continuing my education or toiling away for a paycheque, what right did she have to frown and purse her lips at me?
Now, I realize that everyone is entitled to their own opinion. And I may or may not have a more liberal opinion than most when it comes to “following your bliss.” After all, there was a time in my life when I seriously considered joining the circus or becoming a “drunken artist” as career choices. However, I think Miss Laura’s disapprobation of my decision is symptomatic of a rather unfortunate lie that seems to pervade Western culture.
As I understand it, there was once a time when society frowned upon a woman who sought work outside of her home, excepting those women who chose jobs which by their very nature bespoke of selfless nobility and feminine humility (like being a schoolmarm or a nurse). Only the rebellious or the impoverished would have considered the renunciation of their “natural work” to leave the house every day like a man and join the workforce. I’m not sure of the precise moment when this attitude changed. Maybe it was during WWII with “Rosie the Riveter.” Maybe it was before that. In any case, the opposite attitude now seems to have attained cultural prevalence: that is, outside of Amish and polygamist Mormon circles, women who choose not to work outside the home are (tacitly) derided as lazy, moronic, or absurdly old-fashioned.
What a terrible lie! In the two months following my marriage, I was a most zealous homemaker. I got up in the morning with my husband and prepared a hot breakfast for him. I made coffee and sent him off to work with a balanced meal tucked neatly inside a brown paper bag. I planned meals and shopped for groceries, carefully minding the budget. I cleaned the house, laundered our clothes, and hung them out to dry on our sunny laundry line. Occasionally, I would have some spare time to read, write, or work on a collage. In the afternoon, I would begin preparations for the evening meal. And by the time my husband arrived home from work, I made sure I was showered and dressed with makeup on, that the rooms were filled with the pleasant smell of burning incense, that there was relaxing music on the stereo, and if it was gloomy outside, I lit candles so that the house would seem like a cozy respite from the work-a-day world. This was work that made me blissfully happy, that satisfied some deep (biological?) longing in my soul. It was not work for a moron. It was not easy or light. It was not work for a lazy person, either. I had little down-time; to accomplish all the tasks on my daily agenda required the vigilant management of my time. I ate not a single bon-bon in all those days.
So maybe I’m just an old-fashioned girl at heart. Maybe. In this era, there is lot of talk about the rights and liberties of women. We are (rightfully) indignant when we discover that women in the workforce are frequently paid less than men with whom they share an equal position and workload. We take it for granted that women have the right to work outside of their homes, so much so that we expect this to be the case. I look around my college campus at all the young women seeking a certificate of education, presumably so they can obtain employment, and I wonder: how many of them really want to do what it is they endeavor to do? In most of my classes, the students seem dispassionate, as though they are obliged to be there by some authority, not because they truly have a zeal for knowledge or a passion for the work they will seek with their degree. Even I find myself doubting my motives for being here. After all, since returning to school full-time after two months of domestic bliss, I find my satisfaction with life to be somewhat diminished. I am here because I qualified for a grant to fund my education, and to pass up the opportunity seemed foolish or ungrateful when I considered how many people across the globe would weep tears of joy for such a chance. Yet my own motives are not precisely clear to me. Am I here because I desire to be here, or have I simply (at last) given in to a system that dictates our worth as humans according to our earning potential?
*names changed to protect me from the potentially offended


“What do you do?”
It is the quintessential question of unimaginative adults. It is the mark of a society that has completely quaffed the Kool-Aid of the free market, where one’s human worth is measured net worth. What could be more important identifying information than the nature of your job? Certainly not your values, talents, passions, or other non-monetizable attributes.
The singular focus on work also betrays our preference for the superficial. It is so much more convenient to peg someone by Bureau of Labor Statistic job label than to discover what actually makes them tick.
When did the wonderfully open-ended question “What do you do?” come to mean “What do you do for work?”? I live a damn interesting, fun-filled life; but somehow the things I “do” in pursuit of curiosity and joy don’t seem to factor into the standard introductions. Why are you asking about me if you really don’t care to know?
I experience a sublimated form of the naked contempt you suffered when revealing yourself to be a happy homemaker. (Even the language we have for your activities is so stiltedly 1050’s.) I traded in an enviable law practice for a life of
unpaid service, climbing down most of the available rungs of the economic ladder in the process. My life rocks. As my father once said, in perhaps the kindest thing ever said about me, “In my next life I want to come back as Mark.” And yet, most people are still more comfortable identifying me as a lawyer than as a whatever-the-hell-it-is-that-you-do.
Howard Thurman, the great philosopher, theologian, and civil rights leader, famously wrote: “Don’t ask yourself what the world needs. Ask yourself what makes you come alive and then go do that. Because what the world needs is people who have come alive.” “Doing” in the context of Dr. Thurman’s advice means more than earning a paycheck. And if you are happy and passionate about the things you are “doing”, you have every reason to be proud, no matter what path others might chose for you.
Mark,
Well spoken. I was talking about this with another friend of mine some weeks ago, and she was saying that her lack of a “real job” made her feel “invalidated.” This very lovely woman is paid for her work as a substitute teacher, but perfoms many unpaid and valuable services, such as helping out senior citizens in the community, volunteering at her church, and working in her home as a wife and mother. She said that when people inquired “What do you do?” she often responded with the question “Why do you ask?” which she said invariably annoyed people and caused them to mumble some indignant justification for their seemingly polite line of questioning. I liked that idea, but I’m not brave enough to try it myself. I don’t like to be contrary to someone I’ve just met. I do, however, think that people people need some kind of a jolt to shake them out of their cozy little system of estimation. But most people are so tragically embedded that if you shake the foundations of their method for evaluating others, then the standards by which they establish their own self-worth begin to crumble as well.
Thanks for you comments – it’s always good to know a lawyer!
Milly